Signal Anomalies
When the Circuit Behaves Strangely
The BioCircuit Consciousness Theory (BCCT) starts with a bold premise: consciousness is a signal, and living beings are the receivers. In most cases, that reception is steady and stable enough to sustain our shared sense of reality. But every so often, something strange happens.
Moments arise that don’t fit neatly into everyday tuning. A thought seems to arrive from nowhere, yet proves true. A dream lines up eerily with an event that hasn’t happened yet. Someone thousands of miles away shares the same sudden insight or vision.
These events are often dismissed as coincidence, imagination, or outright fiction. But if BCCT is right, they may be better understood as natural side effects of a living planetary circuit, brief disruptions, expansions, or misalignments in the flow of signal.
This essay will explore five of the most intriguing anomalies: Extra-Sensory Perception (ESP), remote viewing, precognition, telepathy, and out-of-body experiences. They’re not supernatural in this model but perhaps they’re signal behavior is at the edges of what we understand.
Extra-Sensory Perception (ESP)
Extra-Sensory Perception is one of the oldest and most enduring anomalies in the human story. Long before the term “ESP” entered popular culture in the early 20th century, human history was filled with accounts of intuitive knowing. Messages in dreams, flashes of insight, warnings that arrived too early to be explained by sight, sound, or reason. These moments were often treated as mystical, magical, or divine. In the BioCircuit Consciousness Theory, they’re none of those things.
In the BCCT model, ESP is not a “sixth sense” that sits alongside the other five. It’s a shift in access, an expansion of the receiver’s reach into the signal stream. Most of the time, human receivers stay within a certain band of frequencies. That stability keeps the shared reality synchronized and functional. But there are moments when the receiver drifts slightly out of its usual range and touches parts of the signal not normally accessed.
This could happen in any number of ways. The tuning might shift because of emotional intensity from fear, love, grief, or even joy. It might shift because of altered states brought on by meditation, sensory deprivation, or substances. It might shift accidentally, without any clear cause, just as a radio sometimes catches an extra station during unusual weather conditions.
The reason ESP is so famously inconsistent, why it resists laboratory replication and controlled conditions, makes sense in the BCCT model. Stability is the norm. The human receiver has evolved to lock onto a stable band of the signal, because constant drift would make shared reality impossible. Interference from environmental noise, stress, or competing thoughts usually cancels out extended reception. Most people have ESP, but it remains heavily filtered.
There’s another angle: the signal is a shared field. A receiver might occasionally pick up fragments of data meant for another node in the circuit. This can explain flashes of “knowing” that feel borrowed rather than generated. In everyday life, we usually ignore these moments, writing them off as lucky guesses. But in some cases, the reception is clear enough, and the event dramatic enough, that it stands out.
The BCCT perspective also reframes ESP as something not supernatural, but natural. It’s a built-in possibility of a receiver system. That possibility has been noted in nearly every culture, often reserved for individuals thought to be gifted: shamans, oracles, visionaries. In this theory, their wiring stayed the same, but their tuning shifted.
In this light, ESP is a normal function of a complex consciousness circuit, visible only when the usual filters lift for a moment. And those glimpses, fleeting, fragile, and hard to replicate, may be hints at a broader range of signal reception still unexplored.
Remote Viewing
Remote viewing sits at the edge of both intrigue and controversy. In the 1970s and 80s, it attracted serious attention from military and intelligence agencies, particularly through projects like Stargate. The reports were striking: individuals describing distant locations, sometimes with surprising accuracy, without physically traveling there1. Mainstream science largely dismissed the results as coincidence, faulty memory, or creative guesswork. But from the BCCT perspective, remote viewing fits into a coherent pattern of signal anomalies.
Remote viewing can be seen as the receiver’s ability to lock onto non-local signal data. The BioCircuit is not bound by physical distance. Every receiver is a node in the same planetary field, drawing from a shared source. If the signal carries information about all active nodes, then location is just another filter, not a limitation.
Normally, the receiver’s focus is anchored to its immediate sensory environment. But certain conditions like deep focus, altered state, or intentional training, may allow the receiver to retune toward a different node. In remote viewing, the “target” becomes the new point of alignment. The receiver doesn’t move in space; its signal orientation changes.
This retuning is not perfect. Remote viewing sessions are often filled with partial impressions, shapes, colors, textures, even emotional impressions, rather than crisp, complete scenes. In the BCCT framework, this makes sense. The receiver isn’t watching a live broadcast. It’s picking up fragments from another part of the field. The signal may arrive incomplete, layered with noise, or misaligned in time.
Environmental and mental conditions can have a large impact. Too much sensory input from the immediate surroundings can overpower the faint alignment to the target location. Distraction, doubt, or emotional turbulence can destabilize the tuning. This may explain why military protocols for remote viewing often involved quiet rooms, minimal light, and focused meditation before the session began. The goal was to minimize interference.
There’s another dimension worth considering. If all receivers are part of the same planetary circuit, then remote viewing may not involve “seeing” a place directly. Instead, the receiver could be tuning into the impressions of other nodes already connected to that location—people, animals, or even environmental patterns that hold a trace of activity. In this view, remote viewing is not an act of visual projection, but an act of signal sampling.
Whether or not one accepts the historic claims of remote viewing, the BCCT model makes the concept plausible in principle. A shared planetary circuit could allow for cross-location reception under rare conditions. What matters is not the sensational idea of seeing across the world, but the implication: the receiver’s tuning is not as fixed or as local as we tend to assume.
Precognition
Precognition is one of the most unsettling anomalies for a stable-reception model of consciousness. It describes the experience of knowing, sensing, or dreaming about future events before they occur. Reports range from fleeting flashes (a sudden dread before an accident) to detailed dreams later matched to real-world events. In a purely materialist framework, these experiences are usually explained away as coincidence or selective memory. But through the BioCircuit lens, there is room for another explanation.
In the BCCT model, the consciousness signal is not constrained by linear time in the same way a physical receiver is. The receiver experiences life in sequence, one moment after another, because it is embedded in a physical system that processes information in order. But the signal itself may carry information that is layered, overlapping past, present, and potential futures.
Precognition is not prophecy, it is occasional “forward bleed” in the reception. A receiver tuned in a certain way might access fragments of data that have not yet unfolded locally. These fragments are not always literal previews of events; they are more often impressions, symbolic imagery, or emotional patterns. This aligns with how precognitive experiences are commonly reported: a dream that captures the emotional charge of a future event, or an image that seems abstract until the moment arrives.
The question then becomes: why doesn’t this happen all the time? The BCCT model suggests that the stability of the receiver’s normal tuning prevents constant interference from other time layers of the signal. Just as a radio station isolates one frequency for clarity, the human receiver stays tuned to a consistent “now” to maintain coherence. A drift in that stability, triggered by altered states, stress, or unknown environmental factors, might temporarily allow data from outside the local timeline to slip through.
There is also a statistical factor. If the signal contains all possible outcomes, most receivers are not aligned in a way that filters out probable futures from countless unrealized ones. When precognition occurs, it may represent a rare instance where the receiver locks onto a highly probable event already forming in the field. This would make precognition more about probability detection than fate.
Scientific testing of precognition has struggled because the phenomenon resists deliberate activation. In BCCT terms, this is expected. The conditions that create a forward bleed are subtle, often unrepeatable, and influenced by individual tuning stability. The absence of repeatable laboratory evidence doesn’t disprove the anomal but rather highlights the rarity of the reception state needed to produce it.
In the BioCircuit model, precognition is another example of a signal behaving in ways that surprise the receiver. It is less about bending time and more about a complex field occasionally revealing more than one layer of its structure.
Telepathy
Telepathy, the direct exchange of thoughts or impressions between individuals, has long been a staple of both folklore and experimental parapsychology. From twins who sense each other’s distress to friends who “know” what the other is about to say, these moments are usually brushed aside as coincidence or deep familiarity. In the BioCircuit Consciousness Theory, telepathy is neither magic nor a supernatural gift. It is a function of the shared signal field under certain alignment conditions.
In BCCT, every receiver is tuned to the same planetary consciousness signal, but each one filters and processes that signal individually. Under normal circumstances, the signal from one receiver does not directly intrude into another’s conscious processing. The stability of these individual filters allows for privacy, autonomy, and a coherent sense of self.
However, telepathic moments may occur when two receivers temporarily align their filters in a way that allows partial overlap. This alignment could be emotional, driven by deep trust, shared history, or intense emotional states. It might also be situational, created by environmental conditions that reduce interference or noise, such as quiet, meditative states or shared focus on a specific thought.
One possible BCCT mechanism for telepathy is resonance. Two receivers in strong emotional or cognitive resonance might synchronize enough to allow direct data sharing through the shared field. This could explain why telepathy is most commonly reported between people with strong emotional bonds (siblings, close friends, partners) where alignment of thought patterns is more likely.
The transfer itself is rarely experienced as full sentences or clear “hearing” of another’s thoughts. More often it arrives as an impression, a sudden knowing, or a felt sense of what the other person intends to communicate. This aligns with the BCCT view that the signal field carries data as patterns, not as language. The receiving mind interprets the incoming pattern through its own mental framework, creating a subjective sense of “hearing” or “feeling” the thought.
Telepathy also seems to share the same instability as other anomalies in the BCCT model. It cannot be summoned on command in controlled conditions, and it often appears when least expected. This may be because the alignment of filters is delicate. Distraction, emotional turbulence, or skepticism can quickly break the resonance.
In BCCT, telepathy does not challenge the idea of individual minds. Instead, it highlights that individuality exists within a shared circuit. Brief moments of alignment can allow receivers to tap directly into each other’s streams, bypassing the normal channels of language or sensory cues. These moments, while rare, hint at the underlying unity of the planetary field.
Out-of-Body Experiences (OBEs)
Out-of-body experiences occupy a unique space in discussions about consciousness. They are often described in two contexts: sudden separation during near-death events, and intentional departure during meditation, trance, or sleep. In both cases, the individual reports perceiving the world from a perspective outside their physical body.
Traditional explanations tend to divide into two camps:
Neurological illusions caused by brain stress
Spiritual projections of a “soul”
The BioCircuit Consciousness Theory offers a different perspective. In our model, the physical body is the local hardware of the receiver. Most of the time, consciousness is oriented through that hardware, providing a stable perspective and a coherent sense of embodiment. But orientation is not the same as attachment. The receiver processes the signal from a specific point of reference, and in rare situations, that reference point can shift.
An OBE, may not be a departure of consciousness from the body. It is a shift in the receiver’s perspective within the field. The physical body continues to function as the node anchoring the signal, but the perspective temporarily detunes from the usual sensory feed. This allows perception to occur as though the receiver is positioned somewhere else entirely.
Reports of OBEs often include highly consistent features: a floating sensation, the ability to see the body from above, and an expanded awareness of the environment. These descriptions suggest that the shifted perspective is still anchored to local space. BCCT accounts for this by noting that the signal remains tied to the physical node. The perspective can move, but it stays within the bounds of the field connection.
Environmental and physical stress often play a role in triggering OBEs. Near-death experiences, extreme fatigue, and trauma may disrupt the stability of the receiver’s orientation. Likewise, meditation, lucid dreaming, or sensory deprivation can reduce interference from normal sensory channels, making a shift in perspective more accessible.
The most intriguing aspect of OBEs is that some individuals report verifiable observations from their altered vantage point, details they could not have known without visual access. While skeptics argue these are cases of luck or subconscious inference, BCCT leaves open the possibility that the shifted perspective genuinely taps into the shared field’s environmental data.
Importantly, this does not depend on a belief in disembodied travel. The body remains the signal’s physical anchor. The OBE is a reconfiguration of reception, not a departure. When the perspective returns to its standard orientation, the experience is remembered as a “journey” outside the body, but in this model, the journey is a change in tuning, not a literal relocation.
In the BioCircuit framework, OBEs are less a question of escaping the body and more a demonstration of the receiver’s flexibility. The perspective is not fixed but rather it is anchored. And in rare, unstable moments, the anchor can loosen just enough to show that perception is not as tied to physical position as we usually believe.
Beyond the Edge of Normal Reception
The BioCircuit Consciousness Theory begins with stability. For life to function, most receivers remain tuned to a consistent band of the signal, holding reality steady. But stability is not perfection. A living, planetary circuit is dynamic, and like any complex system, it produces moments that don’t fit the usual pattern.
Extra-Sensory Perception, remote viewing, precognition, telepathy, and out-of-body experiences are often treated as curiosities, delusions, or superstition. Yet within the BCCT framework, they are neither mistakes nor miracles. They are natural expressions of a signal occasionally operating outside the narrow range most receivers experience.
These anomalies remind us that the boundaries of consciousness are set by tuning, not by absolute limits. Each one is a small window into a wider range of possibilities: the expanded access of ESP, the non-local perception of remote viewing, the layered time glimpses of precognition, the resonance of telepathy, and the perspective shifts of OBEs.
They also raise important questions. If these experiences are signal behavior, could they be cultivated? Could we learn to stabilize expanded tuning, or are these glimpses meant to remain rare, occasional flashes of a larger reality to keep us anchored in the shared field?
The BCCT doesn’t claim to answer all of these questions. What it offers is a framework in which these experiences are not outliers to be dismissed, but phenomena to be explored. The anomalies sit at the edge of reception, hinting at a more complex, more interconnected circuit than we are used to seeing.
In that sense, they are less proof of the supernatural and more evidence that the signal is still full of surprises.
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Stargate Project: An Overview. 1995 (https://irp.fas.org/program/collect/air1995.pdf)